1. Research
  2. Globale Suche

Global headwinds make continental value chains more attractive

Author
Deutsche Bank Research Management
Stefan Schneider
The German export sector has had to cope with numerous challenges over the last few years. These include “homemade” problems, above all in the auto industry, but also the shift in US trade policy. Climate change has become an increasingly important issue, too; in fact, it implies massive changes. That is why the long-term trend in many manufacturing sectors appeared unclear even ahead of the coronavirus pandemic. Now, COVID-19 has compounded already existing uncertainties. From our vantage point, a number of reasons support our hypothesis that continental value chains are likely to gain importance.

ESG considerations raise questions about whether global supply chains really make sense.

Attention is shifting towards humanitarian, social and ecological issues. The “Fridays for Future” activists, who are getting much attention in the media, openly call on corporate managers to take responsibility for environmental and climate damage. There is a broad social consensus that climate protection should play a major role in the recent stimulus packages. Carbon tariffs, if they were introduced, would change industrial cost structures as well. Economists have already discussed this measure in a climate-policy framework. In fact, carbon tariffs were suggested as a potential steering and financing tool in the discussion about the EU Recovery Fund.
Even though we are currently experiencing the deepest recession since the Second World War, consumers are increasingly re-thinking their consumption patterns. More and more of them (if still not enough) are boycotting goods produced without respect for minimum social standards (not to mention inhuman conditions). The fact that the German government is currently discussing a new “supply chain law” underlines that this is a relevant topic for society as a whole. The new law will oblige companies to monitor their global value chains and make sure that social, environmental and climate protection standards are adhered to around the world. A Herculean task indeed. And the law comes at an inopportune moment for companies, seeing that will increase corporate expenses right when a virus-related spike in insolvencies is looming. The related risks might cause not only SMEs to avoid certain countries. 

Geopolitical tensions make global supply chains less attractive.

2020 Top 4 Bilateral German Exports 
Sources: Deutsche Bank Research, Federal Statistical Office
In 2019, the most important markets outside Europe were the US, with a share of almost 9% in total German exports, and China, with a share of more than 7%. Both countries are important production and research locations, too. The increase in geopolitical tensions comes at the worst possible moment for the German export sector. After all, a strong economic upswing in China might help to stabilise the situation in Germany and thus protect jobs. At the same time, sales opportunities in the US appear to be deteriorating, at least in the coming months, as the pandemic spreads. This means that China might be the most important market for German exporters – and not just in April or May, but also for the remainder of the year. The economic divergence between the two global powers is likely to remain on the political agenda regardless of the outcome of the US presidential elections on 3 November. This means that Germany may have to walk a fine line between security and growth.
Geopolitical trends and the growing importance of ESG issues already suggested before the COVID-19 outbreak that major changes in the supply chains might be necessary in the long run. The virus-related supply shortages have led to a considerable increase in the desire for security. There are, therefore, significant incentives to scale back the global supply chains, which were established for maximum efficiency, and return to more regional supply patterns. This development is likely to increase corporate expenses in the short term and weigh on global productivity growth in the medium term. Still, as numerous global challenges loom, it might also make the economy more crisis-resilient.
 

© Copyright 2021. Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Research, 60262 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. All rights reserved. When quoting please cite “Deutsche Bank Research”.

The above information does not constitute the provision of investment, legal or tax advice. Any views expressed reflect the current views of the author, which do not necessarily correspond to the opinions of Deutsche Bank AG or its affiliates. Opinions expressed may change without notice. Opinions expressed may differ from views set out in other documents, including research, published by Deutsche Bank. The above information is provided for informational purposes only and without any obligation, whether contractual or otherwise. No warranty or representation is made as to the correctness, completeness and accuracy of the information given or the assessments made. In Germany this information is approved and/or communicated by Deutsche Bank AG Frankfurt, licensed to carry on banking business and to provide financial services under the supervision of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin). In the United Kingdom this information is approved and/or communicated by Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch, a member of the London Stock Exchange, authorized by UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and subject to limited regulation by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (under number 150018) and by the PRA. This information is distributed in Hong Kong by Deutsche Bank AG, Hong Kong Branch, in Korea by Deutsche Securities Korea Co. and in Singapore by Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch. In Japan this information is approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Securities Inc. In Australia, retail clients should obtain a copy of a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to any financial product referred to in this report and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product.

17.3.0