1. Research
19. Oktober 2020
The trend towards 'localisation' leaves few easy options for large companies. Their huge advantage from global supply chains and businesses, built up during the last few decades of globalisation, may unwind unless they adapt to local- or multi-local business models. The urgency to adapt has been turbocharged by covid-19. [mehr]
19 October 2020 The trend towards 'localisation' leaves few easy options for large companies. Their huge advantage from global supply chains and businesses, built up during the last few decades of globalisation, may unwind unless they adapt to local- or multi-local business models. The urgency to adapt has been turbocharged by covid-19. In this piece, we examine five localisation forces that now conspire against large companies and favour small ones. These include plummeting foreign investment, wage rises in outsourced locations, the escalation in ESG focus on global supply chains, and growing political and customer pressures for 'local' products. Ultimately, large companies must adapt. We outline some potential avenues that large companies can take that smaller ones cannot. Figure 1: Several forces conspire against large companies 1 Profits of large companies have outpaced those of small firms during the era of globalisation 2 But FDI will drop up to this year 4 And covid-19 has amplified other localisation pressures 3 Meanwhile, customers are turning away from large companies European FDI into China (WTO admission in 2001-2011 peak) Ebitda margin of large firms over small firms 2yr change: +7% - Confidence in small business Confidence in large business ESG: supply chains and staff health Politics Rising Chinese wages 2019: $1.5tn 2020: $920bn-$1.1tn Source : Factset, Haver Analytics, European Commission, UNCTAD, Gallup, Deutsche Bank Luke Templeman, CPA Research Analyst +44-20-754-17373 Jim Reid Strategist +44-20-754-72943 Deutsche Bank AG/London DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS ARE LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. MCI (P) 064/04/2020. DURING THE PERIOD NOVEMBER 2018 to MARCH 2020 DISCLOSURES MAY HAVE DISPLAYED INCOMPLETE INFORMATION, PLEASE SEE APPENDIX 1 FOR FURTHER DETAILS. Deutsche Bank Research Global Cross-Discipline Corporate Bank Research Date Can big companies survive localisation? 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 2 Deutsche Bank AG/London Table Of Contents Summary on a page...........................................................................................3 Big companies have enjoyed globalisation. That may now reverse...................4 How large companies depend on foreign investment.......................................5 Several forces are conspiring against big companies........................................8 Large companies have been slow to react.......................................................14 Smaller companies will find it easier to adjust to the new world.....................15 What can large companies do?.......................................................................15 Finally, how local is local?................................................................................17 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 3 Summary on a page n Large companies have enjoyed the last few decades of globalisation as they have been the ones with the resources to invest in global supply chains and businesses. n Covid-19 has turbocharged the deglobalisation movement as supply chains have been upended, geopolitical risk has risen, and ESG-conscious customers and investors have pushed companies to be more 'resilient' and local. n Yet, only 35 per cent of companies have begun to implement plans to localise their business. n Profit margins of large companies are sensitive to foreign investment. As FDI increased after China joined the WTO, so too did the margins of large companies relative to their smaller rivals. However, when FDI decreased, large company margins fell and smaller firms caught up. n A 40 per cent drop in global FDI is expected this year (source: unctad.org, World Investment Report). That is a serious concern for large companies that depend upon it (either directly or indirectly). n While the pandemic and the drop in FDI will challenge the supremacy of large companies, several other forces are conspiring against them. These include rising wages in China and the lack of outsourcing alternatives that have China's scale. n Customers increasingly prefer small businesses. Indeed, less than 20 per cent of people now have "confidence" in large businesses, while 75 per cent of people have a favourable opinion of small businesses. n Political opinion is moving against large companies as leaders respond to populism. Corporate tax increases are on the horizon as are greater regulations in some industries. n This year, large companies have become the focus of attention for ESG investors who have brought supply chain resiliency within their remit. In particular, these investors are concerned about the dependence on a narrow set of suppliers and supplier countries. The extent of this oversight is far greater for large companies that small ones. n Small companies will find it easier to adapt to localisation. They are not burdened by the scale of investment in global supply chains as are large companies. As they purchase inputs and labour in smaller quantities than do large companies, they will have more options to source locally. Small companies are typically under less investor pressure to build expensive spare capacity into their supply chain. Of course, this spare capacity is extremely useful during a supply shock, but it may be some time before this occurs again. n Large companies have several options but they all involve cost and change. The first is an acquisition strategy to purchase 'local' brands and maintain them as independent business units. Another is to reform centralised global operations and supply chains into a multi-local configuration. n Large firms can use some advantages from their existing scale. In particular, they can use data more effectively than can small companies. They are also better placed to respond to the growing trend of customisation. 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 4 Deutsche Bank AG/London Big companies have enjoyed globalisation. That may now reverse. Globalisation has gifted large companies benefits that have not accrued to smaller firms. However, as the world begins to deglobalise, those advantages may reverse. While some companies have been aware of this for some time, a response has suddenly become far more urgent as the momentum powering the shift to localisation has been turbocharged by covid-19. Indeed, localisation has become one of the most discussed topics by both US and European companies since the outbreak of the pandemic this year as shown in the following charts. Figure 2: Localisation is a hot topic in the US ... 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Dec 15 Dec-16 Dec-17 Dec-18 Dec-19 US corporate documents discussing "localization efforts" A sharp jump since the covid-19 outbreak Source : AlphaSense, Deutsche Bank Figure 3: … and in Europe 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Dec 15 Dec-16 Dec-17 Dec-18 Dec-19 European corporate documents discussing "localisation efforts" A sharp jump since the covid-19 outbreak Source : AlphaSense, Deutsche Bank Before we examine the localisation forces that are pushing large companies to change, it is worth briefly discussing how globalisation has helped large companies. Essentially, the benefits stemmed from their means to invest in facilities and relationships in countries with low cost labour. In addition, corporates with scale established international supply chains that reduced their costs of inputs and manufacturing. Consumers benefited. In fact, the savings due to globalisation and commoditisation meant that the cost of US goods has fallen 11 per cent since China joined the WTO. Of course, this is not the only reason, but it is a significant factor. 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 5 Figure 4: World Trade (% of GDP) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 2010 Source : World Bank, Haver Analytics, Klasing and Milionis, Deutsche Bank Figure 5: Goods have been unusually cheap for the last few decades -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 '80 '84 '88 '92 '96 '00 '04 '08 '12 '16 '20 CPI of US commodities (ex food and energy yoy%) Source : Haver Analytics Today, the era of globalisation is waning. Jim Reid's recent Long-Term Asset Return Study predicted that the world is entering an 'Age of Disorder' in which several factors will collide to roll back globalisation. Already, there are signs that deglobalisation is taking place and the above chart shows that world trade has plateaued over the last decade. On top of this, technological advances may reduce trade by themselves. By one estimate, global merchandise trade could fall up to 30 per cent over the coming decade 1 . That could stem from the increase in automation and the steady reduction in parts needed to make products. As large companies consider the long and expensive process of localisation, small companies have a natural advantage. They are already more likely to use local sources for their goods and labour. They are also nimble enough, and order and hire in small enough quantities, that they can find alternative suppliers more easily than can large corporates. Compounding these 'reverse scale' advantages is that they come right at the time that customer sentiment has turned against big companies. Large companies must therefore adjust their businesses or risk conceding market share to small firms. As the costs of localisation are significant, committing to them will take courage and incentives may have to change as recouping the costs may take longer than the tenure of many chief executives. How large companies depend on foreign investment Of the many advantages afforded to large companies over the last few decades, there are two that stand out. The first is that since the 1980s, countries have competed to loosen regulations and encourage corporate growth. The second was the Chinese economic reopening which saw an explosion of labour onto the global market. For the companies with the scale to invest in China, this resulted in vastly cheaper costs. 1 Finbarr Livesey, "From Global to Local", 2017 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 6 Deutsche Bank AG/London Figure 6: Labour force of the more developed world and China (15-64 year old population, millions) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1950 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090 China More Developed Regions Source : Deutsche Bank, Haver Analytics, United Nations The corporate advance into China accelerated after the country gained admission to the WTO in late 2001. Since then, annual foreign direct investment from the US into China has increased by a factor of 12 to $120bn. Similarly, European FDI into China has been more variable but has roughly tripled. As this FDI was plunged into China with a view to taking advantage of cheap labour and inputs, it led to increased operating margins. In many ways, this helped large companies more than small ones. To calculate by how much, we looked at companies in the five sectors that commonly have international supply chains with China 2 . We then examined the difference in operating margins between the largest half of those companies and the smallest half. The following charts show the period since China joined the WTO for US and European companies. They track FDI by the US and Europe into China and overlay the additional ebitda margin that large companies generated over small companies for the same period. 2 Consumer discretionary, consumer staples, industrials, technology, communications 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 7 Figure 7: Large US companies rely on FDI to China to outperform smaller companies 3 4 5 6 7 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20 Comparison of ebitda margins in large v small S&P 500 companies and the US FDI into China since WTO admission US FDI to China: $bn (lhs) Premium of ebitda margin of big companies over small companies (rhs) After China joined the WTO, investment from the US into China quadrupled. The large companies that could best afford this investment saw their margins rise above As the financial crisis hit, US companies cut their growth in FDI into China. At the same time, large companies lost ground (in terms of margins) to smaller companies When US companies began to invest in China once again in 2015, the margins of large companies again began to outperform those of smaller companies Source : Factset, Haver Analytics, Deutsche Bank For the US, the above chart shows three distinct periods. Between the time of China's admission to the WTO and the financial crisis, US FDI into China doubled and the ebitda margins of large companies outpaced those of small companies by a fifth. Then came the financial crisis and US FDI into China stalled. For the next six years, corporations were conservative and FDI levels remained flat. During this period of stagnant FDI, large companies lost ground to small companies. Indeed, the ebitda margin premium of large companies shrank and hit its lowest point in 2015. Finally, corporate animal spirits returned in 2015 and investment into China resumed apace. In fact, it almost doubled over the next five years. Profit margins for large companies surged; between 2015 and 2020, the ebitda margin 'premium' generated by large companies relative to small companies almost doubled. In Europe, large companies appear to be similarly dependent on FDI into China. The following chart shows that as European FDI into China increased, so too did large companies' operating margins relative to those of small companies. Then, as FDI into China fell after the continent's sovereign debt crisis, so too did operating margins. 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 8 Deutsche Bank AG/London Figure 8: Large European companies have been similarly dependent on FDI to China to drive their profits relative to small companies 2 3 4 5 6 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Comparison of ebitda margins in large v small companies in the Stoxx 600 and the European FDI into China since WTO admission EA 19 direct investment to China $bn (lhs) Premium of ebitda margin of big companies over small companies (rhs) Source : Factset, Haver Analytics, Rhodium Group for the European Commission, Deutsche Bank While these charts show how important investment into China has been for large companies there is a bigger point. In this specific analysis, China can be thought of as a proxy for globalisation itself. Of course, many other factors have contributed to the difference in performance of large and small companies, but China's rise has been a key phenomenon over the last few decades. Below, we discuss how the pendulum is swinging from globalisation back to localisation. As it does, large companies have much to do if they are to maintain their competitive advantage. Several forces are conspiring against big companies Just as large companies have benefited from globalisation over the past few decades, so too are they set to be hurt as this unwinds. This section details five forces that are propelling the shift towards corporate localisation at the expense of global businesses. These five factors will affect large corporates in different ways; however, it is almost certain that all firms will feel some impact from these factors. Before we begin, there is no question that each of the forces pushing against large companies have been amplified by the pandemic. What is more worrying, though, is that disruptions like this are becoming more common. In fact, disruptions lasting a month or longer now occur every 3.7 years on average, estimates McKinsey 3 . Furthermore, the financial toll associated with the most extreme events has been climbing as global networks offer more "surface area" for shocks to spread and cause greater damage. This increased business risk from future pandemics is directly proportionate to the increase in the value that society places on human life. Assuming this continues to rise, the threshold for implementing economic restrictions to control disease will fall. 3 McKinsey Global Institute; "Risk, resilience, and rebalancing in global value chains" 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 9 The consequences for localisation of similar future events are therefore likely to be increasingly severe. This is particularly the case for companies with direct or indirect reliance upon international supply chains and labour. As this is greatest advantage for many large companies, this will also be their biggest risk in a deglobalising world. The first force acting against large companies is falling foreign direct investment. As the last section explained, increasing FDI, and particularly FDI into China, has gone hand-in-hand with large companies increasing their profitability relative to small companies. Conversely, when FDI falls, so too has the additional margin earned by large companies. The drop in FDI this year will be brutal. The UN's World Investment Report predicts global FDI will fall 40 per cent to 2005 levels of below $1tn. Furthermore, both new greenfield investment and cross-border mergers and acquisitions dropped by more than 50 per cent in the first months of 2020 compared with last year. The following table shows that the damage will be wrought across the globe. Figure 9: Global FDI is set to fall 40 per cent this year 0 500 1000 1500 2000 World Europe North America Developing countries FDI inflows 2017 2018 2019 2020 midpoint forecast Source : UNCTAD, Deutsche Bank This drop in FDI seems almost certain to drive down the ebitda margins of large companies. We have begun to see this effect this year as international supply chains have broken down. Of course, many have resumed; however, investors are now pushing management to build in additional capacity to their supply chain. This means diversifying from reliance upon a single international supplier. As companies endure the operational costs of doing this (on top of the capital costs) their operating margins will be hurt in the short and medium term. Given China has been the world's manufacturing powerhouse during the era of globalisation, it should not be surprising that, so far this year, corporate leaders have spent a lot of time discussing the topic. The following chart shows the growth in corporate documents that discussed various Chinese issues since the outbreak of the pandemic. The second factor working against big companies is the rise in Chinese wages. This is related to the growth in FDI in that the significant investment, combined with changing demographics in China, mean the labour force is highly utilised. Thus, the 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 10 Deutsche Bank AG/London benefits of sourcing labour from China have fallen. As Chinese demography continues to decrease the working-age population, corporates should expect wage growth to continue. Figure 10: There has been large growth in the discussion of Chinese supply chains during the pandemic -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% China trade war China supply chain China market China tariffs China operations The increase in discussion about topics related to China during the pandemic US Europe Source : AlphaSense, Deutsche Bank Figure 11: Chinese wages are now higher than several rival countries - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 Philippines Tajikistan Indonesia Vietnam Kyrgyzstan Israel Georgia Armenia Azerbaijan Mongolia Thailand Kazakhstan Malaysia China Macau Taiwan Hong Kong Japan South Korea Source : Deutsche Bank Wage rises in China means the cost of manufacturing in the country has risen significantly. Indeed, once energy costs are included, the cost of manufacturing is only five per cent below that in the US, according to BCG's cost-competitive index 4 . Countries that are cheaper than China (including energy costs) include Mexico, Ireland, India, Thailand, and Romania. Furthermore, countries such as Hungary and Poland are only slightly more expensive than China. Given their geographical proximity for European corporates, this makes for a compelling discussion. The third deglobalisation factor pushing against large corporates is the sudden escalation in ESG investors focussing on supply chains and employee-related pandemic issues. These issues disproportionately affect large companies and these are the ones that are generally the focus of attention by large investors with the clout to demand change. Large companies are also far more likely to find themselves in the media for ESG-related reasons. 4 BCG: "How shifting costs are altering the math of global manufacturing" 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 11 Figure 12: ESG issues have surged in the US corporate discussion ... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Gender equality Clean water Biodiversity Infrastructure Sustainable cities Education Sustainable partnerships Climate change Poverty Responsible production Health Inequality Growth in ESG issues (according to UN SDGs) discussed in US corporate documents Q3'20 yoy Note: Excludes SDGs with very low mentions Source : AlphaSense, Deutsche bank Figure 13: … as they have in Europe 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Clean water Sustainable cities Gender equality Infrastructure Biodiversity Poverty Education Sustainable partnerships Climate change Responsible production Inequality Health Growth in ESG issues (according to UN SDGs) discussed in European corporate documents Q3'20 yoy Note: Excludes SDGs with very low mentions Source : AlphaSense, Deutsche bank The above charts show how health and inequality have become the hottest growth topics in company reports this year. Of course, the ethical treatment of people should go without saying; however, with regards to health, and in the context of the pandemic, it has become difficult to assess 'good' and 'bad' practice. Indeed, the issue probably exists on a spectrum and depends on details about a person's specific relationship with the company. The ESG spotlight tends to fall on large companies more heavily than small ones. Many corporates therefore feel sandwiched. For example, on one side, some governments have encouraged corporates to send staff back to the office as 2020 has worn on and thus support city-centre economies. On the other side, staff feel increasingly comfortable working from home. The following charts show that employees are increasingly keen to work from home after the pandemic recedes. In addition, employees are increasingly figuring out how to be productive as they work from home. Hence why assessing ESG issues is becoming increasingly difficult for the large companies that are most in the spotlight. Figure 14: Workers increasingly want to be at home ... 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Apr May Jun July Sept "Once the virus has passed, how many times a week do you think you will work from home?" (responses per DB monthly survey %) 2-3 days "Only when I have to" Source : DB Primary Research Figure 15: … and they are increasingly productive 0 20 40 60 80 100 Apr May Jun July Sept Self-reported productivity working from home compared with the office (responses per DB monthly survey %) More productive Neither more or less productive Less productive Source : DB Primary Research On both sides of the Atlantic, there has been a strong increase in the discussion of supply chain as an ESG issue, particularly supply chains that involve sourcing from single countries, in many cases China. 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 12 Deutsche Bank AG/London Analysing the dependence of a country's supply chain on China is complex, however; one factor we examine is the level of general imports less intermediate inputs. This gives us an idea of the dependence of first-order supply chain effects. As the following chart shows, European supply chains are less dependent on China than are those in the US, Canada, Japan, and all the major Asian countries. As a result, the direct impact of the covid-19 will likely be lower for the euro area than for other major countries. Figure 16: Dependence on China depends party on geography DEU ESP FRA ITA NLD BEL USA KOR JPN VNM TWN IND THA MYS CAN IDN PHL 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 Share of Chinese input as a share of total imported input (%) Average distance between the benchmark and the dependence indicator (pp) Dependence on China for supply chains Source : Deutsche Bank, OECD As large companies build more resilience into their supply chains they will move away from just-in-time approaches, where various steps in the supply chain are perfectly timed to reduce overhead. Meanwhile, many small companies will maintain their JIT strategies as they are not subject to the same ESG scrutiny as big companies. Of course, this leaves them more exposed to a future shock, however, in the meantime, they will be faster to market. Forces pushing for deglobalisation have also coincided with forces pushing companies to improve their environmental impact. Many large companies are finding this harder than are smaller firms. That is because smaller firms tend to have a small number of suppliers and the more limited scale of their operations means it is easier for them to track their environmental impact and make quick changes. For example, ESG investors are currently pushing large companies to disclose their 'Scope Three' emissions. This is extremely complex and involves a company understanding the carbon emissions generated at every level of their supply chain, including by outsourced providers. The fourth force pushing localisation on large companies is politics. Across many countries, both rich and poor, leaders are being elected on promises to reinvigorate domestic economies. Ahead of the US election this year, both candidates are talking a big game on stopping US companies from "shipping American jobs overseas" and forcing US companies to think about more local supply chains. Leaders in many other countries have made similar promises. Corporate tax is also in the cross-hairs of politics. Although this affects all companies, it will impact large companies more. Specifically, an increase in corporate tax rates will have an outsized impact on large companies that have arranged their operations to take advantage of low-tax domiciles. 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 13 The OECD is pushing to implement new tax rules over the coming 12 months that aim to negate the tax advantage for corporates shifting between countries (see our piece 2020: An inflection point in global corporate tax?"). Figure 17: Statutory corporate income tax rates (%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 DE GB CA NO JP FR US PT BE NL AU GR DK IT CH ES Source : OECD, Deutsche Bank The shift in these issues is being turbocharged by the political desire to 'level up' those that have been disadvantaged by globalisation. Whilst the recent trend towards populism has several causes, just one is the desire for change shared by those who have been hurt by globalisation. Figure 18: Populism index (% of vote across key countries, population weighted) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 Populism Index (% vote share) Lehman Collapse Source : Deutsche Bank calculations Large companies are set to be the most hurt by the jump in populism. As localisation has become politicised, the threat of tariffs has risen. High-profile companies are finding themselves in the firing line. Just one example is Harley Davidson which was caught in the middle of the US/EU/China trade spat. In contrast, smaller motorcycle brands have fewer worries. It is not only tariffs that large companies should be worried about with respect to populism. Rather, it is that politicians have begun to push large companies to take more social responsibility. Of course, this may be a good thing but, as with environmental responsibility, it comes at a price for the company. And that hands a competitive advantage to smaller companies. The fifth force pushing back against large companies is customers themselves. Indeed, before the pandemic, customers were already rebelling against large companies. That trend has only accelerated since the pandemic outbreak. 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 14 Deutsche Bank AG/London Figure 19: Perception of Americans who have a "great deal" or "quite a lot of confidence in big and small business 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Big business Small business Source : Gallup, Deutsche Bank Figure 20: Proportion of people who have a positive image of large and small business 0 20 40 60 80 100 Big business Small business Source : Gallup, Deutsche Bank It is not just that customers feel disenfranchised from large companies per se. It is that customers trends are changing such that they prefer the product, feeling, and peer signaling ability that is offered by smaller companies and cottage industries. This is a push back from the era of globalisation. This was a time when lower-cost manufacturing meant lower-cost products. And this was right at a time when the internet and technology were allowing for a large range of new products. Smart phones are just one example. But now that the price point of a phone has fallen to levels that have made them affordable by many across the globe, these products have become something of a commodity. Therefore, customers have moved from a mindset of "I want to have that thing" to, "Everyone has that thing, I want something different". This is a difficult proposition for large companies which, naturally, produce many standardised products. Some companies have responded by acquiring smaller companies and maintaining their brand identity. However, these products are still generally sold through regular distribution channels and these have begun to experience pushback from customers who are seeking out more local or openly independent stores. Large companies have been slow to react While the trend to deglobalisation has certainly accelerated since the virus outbreak this year, some of the factors have been in the making for several years. Indeed, in 2012, BCG noted that seven industries had already reached tipping points in their global cost structure that meant localisation was increasingly attractive. Those industries included transportation goods, computers and electronics, machinery and others 5 . Despite the warning signs most companies have been slow to explore localisation. In fact, by 2018, only 35 per cent of companies had or were implementing localisation practises, according to AT Kearney. 5 BCG; "US manufacturing nears the tipping point" 2012 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 15 The biggest reasons for the inertia are the cost and time to localise large businesses. For example, it can take ten years for a chemical company to build a new factory in a developed country. Given that the incentive plans of many chief executives can be five years or less, wholesale localisation may be unlikely. Furthermore, an increasing number are zombie companies which cannot cover their interest costs with their cash flow. They will certainly not invest the big money needed to localise supply chains. Smaller companies will find it easier to adjust to the new world It is not just that external forces appear set to make life harder for large companies. It is also that smaller companies are also better placed to adjust themselves to the new deglobalised world. The first reason why small companies will have an easier time adjusting to deglobalisation and localisation is somewhat counterintuitive. Essentially, it is that they are not burdened by their economies of scale. That is, they do not the have large investments in supply chains, factories, and personnel across various geographies that need to be moved. That makes it much cheaper for small companies to adjust. Not only do they have a substantial degree of local operations and connections, they also deal in lower volumes and so have a wider choice of local suppliers. The 'problem' of large economies of scale is that it decreases the speed at which large companies can adjust to deglobalisation. Compounding this problem is that new technologies and manufacturing processes are reducing the minimum economies of scale in a factory which helps small companies catch up. As industrial 5G applications grow in scope (and possibly 3D printing) the old fixed systems of production and rigid processes that have defined manufacturing over the last century may evolve into more fluid systems which can be driven by even simple forms of artificial intelligence. The second factor that benefits small companies is that they are under less pressure to build resilience into their operations in the form of expensive spare capacity. Of course, there are good reasons why shareholders are currently pressuring large companies to increase their resilience. Yet, smaller companies may look at the risk/ reward equation. For example, a company may take the risk that there will not be another 2020-style supply shock for say, another 20 years. As such, they will not subject themself to the burden of spare capacity. If this risk pays off, that business will outperform others that did invest in spare capacity. What can large companies do? The holy grail for large companies is to localise an appropriate level of their operations without losing the benefits of a globalised brand and the scale the gives them an advantage on costs. Many will not achieve this perfect outcome but there are various benefits that large companies do have in their quest to localise. For starters, localisation does not necessarily mean bringing all manufacturing back to a firm's home country. For European companies it may mean moving production to somewhere in the EU. Regardless, localisation invariably means that 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 16 Deutsche Bank AG/London the average company will have to assume more responsibility for its manufacturing and labour, rather than relying on outsourcing. That is because it takes countries a long time to develop local companies capable of handling outsourced requirements from large companies. As large companies localise production, they have access to some benefits that smaller companies do not. First and foremost, there are growing political benefits and tax incentives for insourcing production. For example, South Korea offers incentives to domestic companies that restore operations. Many other cities, states, and countries will agree bespoke deals with companies to incentivise them. The next advantage large companies have is technology. Big firms are far better placed to provide ESG-conscious customers with transparency information about their products. Blockchains are beginning to be used to prove the provenance of inputs. Just one example is JBS, the world's largest meatpack which will now use blockchain throughout its supply chain to prove the provenance of its cattle. Furthermore, large companies are harnessing big data in ways that smaller companies cannot. Acquisition strategies are another potential response of large companies. This has been used to good effect in the beverage sector. Consider that Diageo owns over two dozen Scotch whisky labels. Many of these maintain a level of independence over their operations and have different styles, branding, target demographics, and fans. This strategy can obviously be successful; however, there is a fine line to walk as some customers actively seek out brands that are truly independent. This means that many companies will have no choice but to compete with the idea of independence. That involves giving customers the 'feeling' that they experience when they purchase from an independent or small company. This feeling comes in several forms and can be that they have benefited the local community, that they have done business with 'ordinary' people , or that by consuming a certain product, they have had an experience that is unusual and different from those in their peer group. In the search for the unusual, large companies are better placed to deliver customisation. The last mass attempt at this strategy occurred in the 1990s (just one example being customised jeans). The experiment failed in part due to customers being unwilling to wait for their products to be manufactured. Today that has changed. Customers are more willing to wait for certain types of products to be delivered. The rise of internet retail has proved that customers are now willing to wait to receive their products. In the case of fashion, they are now willing to buy items without trying them on. That opens up the opportunity for companies to experiment with widespread customisation once more. This is something that large companies may be better placed to do relative to smaller firms as they can afford the significant additional inventory costs which allows a reduced manufacturing time relative to small companies that may have to order components. 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 17 Finally, how local is local? The most difficult question for corporates is "What is localisation?" Does it mean a company basing its operations in a nearby country, in its home country, or in its home state/county/département etc? Or will the trend of multi-localism take off with companies establishing 'bases' in various places and sourcing their inputs as such? The answers to these questions depend, in large part, on customers and shareholders. Although it can be difficult to predict how the thoughts of these two groups will evolve, what seems certain is that the forces driving localisation will continue to gather momentum. That is because those forces come from both angles: top-down politics, and bottom-up customer preferences. Given these trends are only at the beginning of unwinding decades of globalisation, it appears this process has a long way to go. That means that although the costs of localisation may be great, particularly for large companies, the cost of not doing may be greater still. 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 18 Deutsche Bank AG/London Appendix 1 Important Disclosures *Other information available upon request *Prices are current as of the end of the previous trading session unless otherwise indicated and are sourced from local exchanges via Reuters, Bloomberg and other vendors . Other information is sourced from Deutsche Bank, subject companies, and other sources. For disclosures pertaining to recommendations or estimates made on securities other than the primary subject of this research, please see the most recently published company report or visit our global disclosure look-up page on our website at https://research.db.com/Research/Disclosures/CompanySearch . Aside from within this report, important risk and conflict disclosures can also be found at https://research.db.com/Research/Topics/Equities?topicId=RB0002 . Investors are strongly encouraged to review this information before investing. Analyst Certification The views expressed in this report accurately reflect the personal views of the undersigned lead analyst(s). In addition, the undersigned lead analyst(s) has not and will not receive any compensation for providing a specific recommendation or view in this report. Luke Templeman, Jim Reid. 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 19 Additional Information The information and opinions in this report were prepared by Deutsche Bank AG or one of its affiliates (collectively 'Deutsche Bank'). Though the information herein is believed to be reliable and has been obtained from public sources believed to be reliable, Deutsche Bank makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness. Hyperlinks to third-party websites in this report are provided for reader convenience only. Deutsche Bank neither endorses the content nor is responsible for the accuracy or security controls of those websites. If you use the services of Deutsche Bank in connection with a purchase or sale of a security that is discussed in this report, or is included or discussed in another communication (oral or written) from a Deutsche Bank analyst, Deutsche Bank may act as principal for its own account or as agent for another person. Deutsche Bank may consider this report in deciding to trade as principal. It may also engage in transactions, for its own account or with customers, in a manner inconsistent with the views taken in this research report. Others within Deutsche Bank, including strategists, sales staff and other analysts, may take views that are inconsistent with those taken in this research report. Deutsche Bank issues a variety of research products, including fundamental analysis, equity-linked analysis, quantitative analysis and trade ideas. Recommendations contained in one type of communication may differ from recommendations contained in others, whether as a result of differing time horizons, methodologies, perspectives or otherwise. Deutsche Bank and/or its affiliates may also be holding debt or equity securities of the issuers it writes on. Analysts are paid in part based on the profitability of Deutsche Bank AG and its affiliates, which includes investment banking, trading and principal trading revenues. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the author as of the date of this report. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Deutsche Bank and are subject to change without notice. Deutsche Bank provides liquidity for buyers and sellers of securities issued by the companies it covers. Deutsche Bank research analysts sometimes have shorter-term trade ideas that may be inconsistent with Deutsche Bank's existing longer-term ratings. Some trade ideas for equities are listed as Catalyst Calls on the Research Website ( https://research.db.com/Research/ ) , and can be found on the general coverage list and also on the covered company's page. A Catalyst Call represents a high-conviction belief by an analyst that a stock will outperform or underperform the market and/or a specified sector over a time frame of no less than two weeks and no more than three months. In addition to Catalyst Calls, analysts may occasionally discuss with our clients, and with Deutsche Bank salespersons and traders, trading strategies or ideas that reference catalysts or events that may have a near term or medium-term impact on the market price of the securities discussed in this report, which impact may be directionally counter to the analysts' current 12-month view of total return or investment return as described herein. Deutsche Bank has no obligation to update, modify or amend this report or to otherwise notify a recipient thereof if an opinion, forecast or estimate changes or becomes inaccurate. Coverage and the frequency of changes in market conditions and in both general and company-specific economic prospects make it difficult to update research at defined intervals. Updates are at the sole discretion of the coverage analyst or of the Research Department Management, and the majority of reports are published at irregular intervals. This report is provided for informational purposes only and does not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients. It is not an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any financial instruments or to participate in any particular trading strategy. Target prices are inherently imprecise and a product of the analyst's judgment. The financial instruments discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors, and investors must make their own informed investment decisions. Prices and availability of financial instruments are subject to change without notice, and investment transactions can lead to losses as a result of price fluctuations and other factors. If a financial instrument is denominated in a currency other than an investor's currency, a change in exchange rates may adversely affect the investment. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Performance calculations exclude transaction costs, unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise indicated, prices are current as of the end of the previous trading session and are sourced from local exchanges via Reuters, Bloomberg and other vendors. Data is also sourced from Deutsche Bank, subject companies, and other parties. The Deutsche Bank Research Department is independent of other business divisions of the Bank. Details regarding our organizational arrangements and information barriers we have to prevent and avoid conflicts of interest with respect to our research are available on our website ( https://research.db.com/Research/ ) under Disclaimer. Macroeconomic fluctuations often account for most of the risks associated with exposures to instruments that promise to pay fixed or variable interest rates. For an investor who is long fixed-rate instruments (thus receiving these cash flows), increases in interest rates naturally lift the discount factors applied to the expected cash flows and thus cause a loss. The longer the maturity of a certain cash flow and the higher the move in the discount factor, the higher will be the loss. Upside surprises in inflation, fiscal funding needs, and FX depreciation rates are among the most common adverse macroeconomic shocks to receivers. But counterparty exposure, issuer creditworthiness, client segmentation, regulation (including changes in assets holding limits for different types of investors), changes in tax policies, currency convertibility (which may constrain currency conversion, repatriation of profits and/or liquidation of positions), and settlement issues related to local clearing houses are also important risk factors. The sensitivity of fixed-income instruments to macroeconomic shocks may be mitigated by indexing the contracted cash flows to inflation, to FX depreciation, or to specified interest rates - these are common in emerging markets. The index fixings may - by construction - lag or mis-measure the actual move in the underlying variables they are intended to track. The choice of the proper fixing (or metric) is particularly important in swaps markets, where floating coupon rates (i.e., coupons indexed to a typically short-dated interest rate reference index) are exchanged for fixed coupons. Funding in a currency that differs from the currency in which coupons are denominated carries FX risk. Options on swaps (swaptions) the risks typical to options in addition to the risks related to rates movements. Derivative transactions involve numerous risks including market, counterparty default and illiquidity risk. The appropriateness 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 20 Deutsche Bank AG/London of these products for use by investors depends on the investors' own circumstances, including their tax position, their regulatory environment and the nature of their other assets and liabilities; as such, investors should take expert legal and financial advice before entering into any transaction similar to or inspired by the contents of this publication. The risk of loss in futures trading and options, foreign or domestic, can be substantial. As a result of the high degree of leverage obtainable in futures and options trading, losses may be incurred that are greater than the amount of funds initially deposited - up to theoretically unlimited losses. Trading in options involves risk and is not suitable for all investors. Prior to buying or selling an option, investors must review the 'Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options", at http://www.optionsclearing.com/ about/publications/character-risks.jsp . If you are unable to access the website, please contact your Deutsche Bank representative for a copy of this important document. Participants in foreign exchange transactions may incur risks arising from several factors, including the following: (i) exchange rates can be volatile and are subject to large fluctuations; (ii) the value of currencies may be affected by numerous market factors, including world and national economic, political and regulatory events, events in equity and debt markets and changes in interest rates; and (iii) currencies may be subject to devaluation or government-imposed exchange controls, which could affect the value of the currency. Investors in securities such as ADRs, whose values are affected by the currency of an underlying security, effectively assume currency risk. Unless governing law provides otherwise, all transactions should be executed through the Deutsche Bank entity in the investor's home jurisdiction. Aside from within this report, important conflict disclosures can also be found at https:// research.db.com/Research/ on each company's research page. Investors are strongly encouraged to review this information before investing. Deutsche Bank (which includes Deutsche Bank AG, its branches and affiliated companies) is not acting as a financial adviser, consultant or fiduciary to you or any of your agents (collectively, "You" or "Your") with respect to any information provided in this report. Deutsche Bank does not provide investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, Deutsche Bank is not acting as your impartial adviser, and does not express any opinion or recommendation whatsoever as to any strategies, products or any other information presented in the materials. Information contained herein is being provided solely on the basis that the recipient will make an independent assessment of the merits of any investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation of, or express an opinion on, any product or service or any trading strategy. The information presented is general in nature and is not directed to retirement accounts or any specific person or account type, and is therefore provided to You on the express basis that it is not advice, and You may not rely upon it in making Your decision. The information we provide is being directed only to persons we believe to be financially sophisticated, who are capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with regard to particular transactions and investment strategies, and who understand that Deutsche Bank has financial interests in the offering of its products and services. If this is not the case, or if You are an IRA or other retail investor receiving this directly from us, we ask that you inform us immediately. In July 2018, Deutsche Bank revised its rating system for short term ideas whereby the branding has been changed to Catalyst Calls ("CC") from SOLAR ideas; the rating categories for Catalyst Calls originated in the Americas region have been made consistent with the categories used by Analysts globally; and the effective time period for CCs has been reduced from a maximum of 180 days to 90 days. During the period November 2018 to March 2020 Deutsche Bank may have shown incomplete information regarding Disclosure 1 in some parts of the equity research and debt research coverage. If you require any further information please contact DVS.Support@db.com . United States : Approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Bank Securities Incorporated, a member of FINRA, NFA and SIPC. Analysts located outside of the United States are employed by non-US affiliates that are not subject to FINRA regulations. Germany : Approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Bank AG, a joint stock corporation with limited liability incorporated in the Federal Republic of Germany with its principal office in Frankfurt am Main. Deutsche Bank AG is authorized under German Banking Law and is subject to supervision by the European Central Bank and by BaFin, Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority. United Kingdom : Approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Bank AG acting through its London Branch at Winchester House, 1 Great Winchester Street, London EC2N 2DB. Deutsche Bank AG in the United Kingdom is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and is subject to limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority. Details about the extent of our authorisation and regulation are available on request. Hong Kong SAR : Distributed by Deutsche Bank AG, Hong Kong Branch, except for any research content relating to futures contracts within the meaning of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Ordinance Cap. 571. Research reports on such futures contracts are not intended for access by persons who are located, incorporated, constituted or resident in Hong Kong. The author(s) of a research report may not be licensed to carry on regulated activities in Hong Kong, and if not licensed, do not hold themselves out as being able to do so. The provisions set out above in the 'Additional Information' section shall apply to the fullest extent permissible by local laws and regulations, including without limitation the Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed or Registered with the Securities and Futures Commission. This report is intended for distribution only to 'professional investors' as defined in Part 1 of Schedule of the SFO. This document must not be acted or relied on by persons who are not professional investors. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only available to professional investors and will be engaged only with professional investors. 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 21 India : Prepared by Deutsche Equities India Private Limited (DEIPL) having CIN: U65990MH2002PTC137431 and registered office at 14th Floor, The Capital, C-70, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai (India) 400051. Tel: + 91 22 7180 4444. It is registered by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as a Stock broker bearing registration no.: INZ000252437; Merchant Banker bearing SEBI Registration no.: INM000010833 and Research Analyst bearing SEBI Registration no.: INH000001741. DEIPL may have received administrative warnings from the SEBI for breaches of Indian regulations. Deutsche Bank and/or its affiliate(s) may have debt holdings or positions in the subject company. With regard to information on associates, please refer to the "Shareholdings" section in the Annual Report at: https://www.db.com/ir/en/annual reports.htm . Japan : Approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Securities Inc.(DSI). Registration number - Registered as a financial instruments dealer by the Head of the Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Kinsho) No. 117. Member of associations: JSDA, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association and The Financial Futures Association of Japan. Commissions and risks involved in stock transactions - for stock transactions, we charge stock commissions and consumption tax by multiplying the transaction amount by the commission rate agreed with each customer. Stock transactions can lead to losses as a result of share price fluctuations and other factors. Transactions in foreign stocks can lead to additional losses stemming from foreign exchange fluctuations. We may also charge commissions and fees for certain categories of investment advice, products and services. Recommended investment strategies, products and services carry the risk of losses to principal and other losses as a result of changes in market and/or economic trends, and/or fluctuations in market value. Before deciding on the purchase of financial products and/or services, customers should carefully read the relevant disclosures, prospectuses and other documentation. 'Moody's', 'Standard Poor's', and 'Fitch' mentioned in this report are not registered credit rating agencies in Japan unless Japan or 'Nippon' is specifically designated in the name of the entity. Reports on Japanese listed companies not written by analysts of DSI are written by Deutsche Bank Group's analysts with the coverage companies specified by DSI. Some of the foreign securities stated on this report are not disclosed according to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan. Target prices set by Deutsche Bank's equity analysts are based on a 12-month forecast period.. Korea : Distributed by Deutsche Securities Korea Co. South Africa : Deutsche Bank AG Johannesburg is incorporated in the Federal Republic of Germany (Branch Register Number in South Africa: 1998/003298/10). Singapore: This report is issued by Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch (One Raffles Quay #18-00 South Tower Singapore 048583, 65 6423 8001), which may be contacted in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this report. Where this report is issued or promulgated by Deutsche Bank in Singapore to a person who is not an accredited investor, expert investor or institutional investor (as defined in the applicable Singapore laws and regulations), they accept legal responsibility to such person for its contents. Taiwan : Information on securities/investments that trade in Taiwan is for your reference only. Readers should independently evaluate investment risks and are solely responsible for their investment decisions. Deutsche Bank research may not be distributed to the Taiwan public media or quoted or used by the Taiwan public media without written consent. Information on securities/instruments that do not trade in Taiwan is for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as a recommendation to trade in such securities/instruments. Deutsche Securities Asia Limited, Taipei Branch may not execute transactions for clients in these securities/instruments. Qatar : Deutsche Bank AG in the Qatar Financial Centre (registered no. 00032) is regulated by the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority. Deutsche Bank AG - QFC Branch may undertake only the financial services activities that fall within the scope of its existing QFCRA license. Its principal place of business in the QFC: Qatar Financial Centre, Tower, West Bay, Level 5, PO Box 14928, Doha, Qatar. This information has been distributed by Deutsche Bank AG. Related financial products or services are only available only to Business Customers, as defined by the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority. Russia : The information, interpretation and opinions submitted herein are not in the context of, and do not constitute, any appraisal or evaluation activity requiring a license in the Russian Federation. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia : Deutsche Securities Saudi Arabia LLC Company (registered no. 07073-37) is regulated by the Capital Market Authority. Deutsche Securities Saudi Arabia may undertake only the financial services activities that fall within the scope of its existing CMA license. Its principal place of business in Saudi Arabia: King Fahad Road, Al Olaya District, P.O. Box 301809, Faisaliah Tower - 17th Floor, 11372 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. United Arab Emirates : Deutsche Bank AG in the Dubai International Financial Centre (registered no. 00045) is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. Deutsche Bank AG - DIFC Branch may only undertake the financial services activities that fall within the scope of its existing DFSA license. Principal place of business in the DIFC: Dubai International Financial Centre, The Gate Village, Building 5, PO Box 504902, Dubai, U.A.E. This information has been distributed by Deutsche Bank AG. Related financial products or services are available only to Professional Clients, as defined by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. Australia and New Zealand : This research is intended only for 'wholesale clients' within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act and New Zealand Financial Advisors Act, respectively. Please refer to Australia-specific research disclosures and related information at https://australia.db.com/australia/content/research-information.html Where research refers to any particular financial product recipients of the research should consider any product disclosure statement, prospectus or other applicable disclosure document before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. In preparing this report, 19 October 2020 Corporate Bank Research Page 22 Deutsche Bank AG/London the primary analyst or an individual who assisted in the preparation of this report has likely been in contact with the company that is the subject of this research for confirmation/clarification of data, facts, statements, permission to use company-sourced material in the report, and/or site-visit attendance. Without prior approval from Research Management, analysts may not accept from current or potential Banking clients the costs of travel, accommodations, or other expenses incurred by analysts attending site visits, conferences, social events, and the like. Similarly, without prior approval from Research Management and Anti-Bribery and Corruption ("ABC") team, analysts may not accept perks or other items of value for their personal use from issuers they cover. Additional information relative to securities, other financial products or issuers discussed in this report is available upon request. This report may not be reproduced, distributed or published without Deutsche Bank's prior written consent. Backtested, hypothetical or simulated performance results have inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record based on trading actual client portfolios, simulated results are achieved by means of the retroactive application of a backtested model itself designed with the benefit of hindsight. Taking into account historical events the backtesting of performance also differs from actual account performance because an actual investment strategy may be adjusted any time, for any reason, including a response to material, economic or market factors. The backtested performance includes hypothetical results that do not reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings or the deduction of advisory fees, brokerage or other commissions, and any other expenses that a client would have paid or actually paid. No representation is made that any trading strategy or account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Alternative modeling techniques or assumptions might produce significantly different results and prove to be more appropriate. Past hypothetical backtest results are neither an indicator nor guarantee of future returns. Actual results will vary, perhaps materially, from the analysis. The method for computing individual E,S,G and composite ESG scores set forth herein is a novel method developed by the Research department within Deutsche Bank AG, computed using a systematic approach without human intervention. Different data providers, market sectors and geographies approach ESG analysis and incorporate the findings in a variety of ways. As such, the ESG scores referred to herein may differ from equivalent ratings developed and implemented by other ESG data providers in the market and may also differ from equivalent ratings developed and implemented by other divisions within the Deutsche Bank Group. Such ESG scores also differ from other ratings and rankings that have historically been applied in research reports published by Deutsche Bank AG. Further, such ESG scores do not represent a formal or official view of Deutsche Bank AG. It should be noted that the decision to incorporate ESG factors into any investment strategy may inhibit the ability to participate in certain investment opportunities that otherwise would be consistent with your investment objective and other principal investment strategies. The returns on a portfolio consisting primarily of sustainable investments may be lower or higher than portfolios where ESG factors, exclusions, or other sustainability issues are not considered, and the investment opportunities available to such portfolios may differ. Companies may not necessarily meet high performance standards on all aspects of ESG or sustainable investing issues; there is also no guarantee that any company will meet expectations in connection with corporate responsibility, sustainability, and/or impact performance. Copyright © 2020 Deutsche Bank AG David Folkerts-Landau Group Chief Economist and Global Head of Research Pam Finelli Global Chief Operating Officer Research Anthony Klarman Global Head of Debt Research Michael Spencer Head of APAC Research Steve Pollard Head of Americas Research Global Head of Company Research Gerry Gallagher Head of European Company Research Andreas Neubauer Head of Germany Research Peter Milliken Head of APAC Company Research Jim Reid Global Head of Thematic Research Francis Yared Global Head of Rates Research George Saravelos Global Head of FX Research Peter Hooper Global Head of Economic Research International Production Locations Deutsche Bank AG Deutsche Bank Place Level 16 Corner of Hunter & Phillip Streets Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia Tel: (61) 2 8258 1234 Deutsche Bank AG Equity Research Mainzer Landstrasse 11-17 60329 Frankfurt am Main Germany Tel: (49) 69 910 00 Deutsche Bank AG Filiale Hongkong International Commerce Centre, 1 Austin Road West,Kowloon, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 2203 8888 Deutsche Securities Inc. 2-11-1 Nagatacho Sanno Park Tower Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-6171 Japan Tel: (81) 3 5156 6000 Deutsche Bank AG London 1 Great Winchester Street London EC2N 2EQ United Kingdom Tel: (44) 20 7545 8000 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. 60 Wall Street New York, NY 10005 United States of America Tel: (1) 212 250 2500
13.0.4